<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 65Bits Episode 83 : The Chilly One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/</link>
	<description>Moving Swiftly Along</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5170</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5170</guid>
		<description>Is everyone using the same algorithm? Or every user have a different algorithm?

If everyone has the same algorithm, then a hacker just need to reverse the algorithm using trial and error. It's tough, but possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everyone using the same algorithm? Or every user have a different algorithm?</p>
<p>If everyone has the same algorithm, then a hacker just need to reverse the algorithm using trial and error. It&#8217;s tough, but possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Tech: AMD Launches HD4870 X2</title>
		<link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Tech: AMD Launches HD4870 X2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>[...] SG Tech - 65bits: Episode 83 : The Chilly One [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SG Tech - 65bits: Episode 83 : The Chilly One [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTT</title>
		<link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>NTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>@Dhope.

Ooops thanks for pointing that out.. Fixed the link.

As for the SuperGenPass, I would want to disagree.. I don't think the algo is vulnerability. Rather I think it might even be open. Since the bookmarklet must be using javascript to generate the hash.. So finally it still depends on your "seed" password. So it's at least as safe as your password (assuming the hacker knows you are using supergenpass).

Thanks for listening..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dhope.</p>
<p>Ooops thanks for pointing that out.. Fixed the link.</p>
<p>As for the SuperGenPass, I would want to disagree.. I don&#8217;t think the algo is vulnerability. Rather I think it might even be open. Since the bookmarklet must be using javascript to generate the hash.. So finally it still depends on your &#8220;seed&#8221; password. So it&#8217;s at least as safe as your password (assuming the hacker knows you are using supergenpass).</p>
<p>Thanks for listening..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhope</title>
		<link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>Hi, with regards to the Password Gen part of the podcast, I feel the attack done will prob not be dictionary attack but rather by finding the algorithm.

Hence if i try maybe 100 different names on 4-10 websites, the algo should be the same and pattern can be figured out by a dedicated group of geeks. My advice is not to use the program. Humans are the anomalities in this case.

This is a personal opinion. By the way, the link to the site is wrong. Oei!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, with regards to the Password Gen part of the podcast, I feel the attack done will prob not be dictionary attack but rather by finding the algorithm.</p>
<p>Hence if i try maybe 100 different names on 4-10 websites, the algo should be the same and pattern can be figured out by a dedicated group of geeks. My advice is not to use the program. Humans are the anomalities in this case.</p>
<p>This is a personal opinion. By the way, the link to the site is wrong. Oei!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
