<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 65Bits Episode 83 : The Chilly One</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/</link> <description>voice of technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: DK</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5170</link> <dc:creator>DK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:41:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5170</guid> <description>Is everyone using the same algorithm? Or every user have a different algorithm?If everyone has the same algorithm, then a hacker just need to reverse the algorithm using trial and error. It&#039;s tough, but possible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everyone using the same algorithm? Or every user have a different algorithm?</p><p>If everyone has the same algorithm, then a hacker just need to reverse the algorithm using trial and error. It&#8217;s tough, but possible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Tech: AMD Launches HD4870 X2</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link> <dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Tech: AMD Launches HD4870 X2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5111</guid> <description>[...] SG Tech - 65bits: Episode 83 : The Chilly One [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SG Tech &#8211; 65bits: Episode 83 : The Chilly One [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NTT</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5109</link> <dc:creator>NTT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5109</guid> <description>@Dhope.Ooops thanks for pointing that out.. Fixed the link.As for the SuperGenPass, I would want to disagree.. I don&#039;t think the algo is vulnerability. Rather I think it might even be open. Since the bookmarklet must be using javascript to generate the hash.. So finally it still depends on your &quot;seed&quot; password. So it&#039;s at least as safe as your password (assuming the hacker knows you are using supergenpass).Thanks for listening..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dhope.</p><p>Ooops thanks for pointing that out.. Fixed the link.</p><p>As for the SuperGenPass, I would want to disagree.. I don&#8217;t think the algo is vulnerability. Rather I think it might even be open. Since the bookmarklet must be using javascript to generate the hash.. So finally it still depends on your &#8220;seed&#8221; password. So it&#8217;s at least as safe as your password (assuming the hacker knows you are using supergenpass).</p><p>Thanks for listening..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dhope</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/08/13/65bits-episode-83-the-chilly-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link> <dc:creator>Dhope</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/?p=228#comment-5104</guid> <description>Hi, with regards to the Password Gen part of the podcast, I feel the attack done will prob not be dictionary attack but rather by finding the algorithm.Hence if i try maybe 100 different names on 4-10 websites, the algo should be the same and pattern can be figured out by a dedicated group of geeks. My advice is not to use the program. Humans are the anomalities in this case.This is a personal opinion. By the way, the link to the site is wrong. Oei!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, with regards to the Password Gen part of the podcast, I feel the attack done will prob not be dictionary attack but rather by finding the algorithm.</p><p>Hence if i try maybe 100 different names on 4-10 websites, the algo should be the same and pattern can be figured out by a dedicated group of geeks. My advice is not to use the program. Humans are the anomalities in this case.</p><p>This is a personal opinion. By the way, the link to the site is wrong. Oei!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: www.tech65.org @ 2012-02-11 22:18:51 -->
