<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 65Bits Episode 67: FOR HONOUR! FOR GLORY!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/</link> <description>voice of technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Tech65 &#187; Tech65.org is back! Here&#8217;s what you missed!</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/comment-page-1/#comment-3172</link> <dc:creator>Tech65 &#187; Tech65.org is back! Here&#8217;s what you missed!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:43:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/#comment-3172</guid> <description>[...] The Crew        &#171; 65Bits Episode 67: FOR HONOUR! FOR GLORY! [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Crew        &laquo; 65Bits Episode 67: FOR HONOUR! FOR GLORY! [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hisham</title><link>http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/comment-page-1/#comment-3095</link> <dc:creator>Hisham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:16:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech65.org/2008/04/21/65bits-episode-67-for-honour-for-glory/#comment-3095</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;That judgement, rendered by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in the  case of DigiDyne Corp. Vs. Data General ( 734 F.2d 1336 (9th circuit, 1984)) â€œheld that Data Generalâ€™s refusal to license its copyrighted computer software to those who did not purchase its hardware was an unlawful tying arrangementâ€ and this was not over-turned by the U.S. Supreme Court.&lt;/i&gt;An example of how Psystar or anyone else for that matter, could win.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That judgement, rendered by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in the  case of DigiDyne Corp. Vs. Data General ( 734 F.2d 1336 (9th circuit, 1984)) â€œheld that Data Generalâ€™s refusal to license its copyrighted computer software to those who did not purchase its hardware was an unlawful tying arrangementâ€ and this was not over-turned by the U.S. Supreme Court.</i></p><p>An example of how Psystar or anyone else for that matter, could win.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: www.tech65.org @ 2012-02-11 22:38:20 -->
